banner
 
  Home >> Blogs >> Why does Jesus Have Two Genealogies?

this user is offline now  Bibleguy
Send message

Subscribe
Gender: Male
Status:
Age: 73 Years

City:
State:
Country: United States


Signup Date: 09/06/2012

Categories:
  Religion & Philosophy

Archive:
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012

Who Gives Kudos:





 

10:15 AM   [06 Sep 2012 | Thursday]

Why does Jesus Have Two Genealogies?

A genealogy is a record of ancestors or descendents. The Bible gives two of them for Jesus. One is in Matthew 1:1-17, and the other is in Luke 3:23-38. The two lists of ancestors of Jesus are not the same.

Matthew’s account begins with Abraham and moves forward in time. Luke’s list moves backward in time, starting with Jesus, and going all the way to Adam.

There have been several theories by biblical scholars as to why these two lists are different. In addition, some skeptics of the Bible use these different genealogies as an argument for the inaccuracy of the Bible.

After reading the leading theories, only one of them made sense to me. Matthew’s list is clearly the genealogy of Joseph. Luke’s account lists the ancestors of Mary. That is why they contain different lists of ancestors. One gospel is listing the ancestors from one side of Jesus’ family, the other gospel enumerates the other side of the family. This theory is not accepted by everyone, because although Joseph’s name is in his list of ancestors, Mary’s name does not appear in her genealogy.

Let’s take a look at the very end of Joseph’s genealogy found in Matthew:

“And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob; And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.” (Matthew 1:15-16 KJV)

 

The genealogy in Matthew’s is traced through the father as per Jewish custom. His intention was probably to prove to the Jews that Jesus was a descendant of David, and, therefore, legally entitled to sit on his throne.

There was a problem, however, with Joseph’s lineage. One of his ancestors was King Jechonias (also called Coniah) who was cursed by God because he was so evil.

“Thus saith the LORD, Write ye this man childless, a man that shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah.” (Jeremiah 22:30 KJV)

God’s curse said that no seed of Coniah would ever be king. So how could Jesus inherit the throne having Coniah in His legal lineage? The answer is, He couldn’t. Although He was legally descended from David in Joseph’s genealogy, the curse from God blocked that lineage from David’s throne.

This fact makes it clear why there is a second genealogy in Luke that is traced through Jesus’ mother, Mary. While the genealogy in Matthew is for legal purposes, the ancestry of Mary shows the bloodline of Jesus.

 

Mary is also descended from David, and there is no block to the throne in her family history. Mary’s descent from David comes through his son, Nathan, not Solomon. Let’s look at that part of Mary’s ancestry in Luke:

“Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David,” (Luke 3:31 KJV)

But you say, “Wait a second, Bibleguy, how could Mary transmit the right of David’s throne to Jesus when that inheritance had to be conveyed through the males in the family?” “Hmmmm?”

The answer to that very good question can be found in Numbers 27:8.

“And thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel, saying, If a man die, and have no son, then ye shall cause his inheritance to pass unto his daughter.” (KJV)

According to Israel law, if a daughter is the only heir, then she can inherit her father’s possessions and rights. There is no mention in the Bible that Mary has any brothers, so her husband, Joseph, would have become the heir of Mary’s father, Heli.

 

Since women were not listed in the genealogies, Joseph’s name appears on the list, not Mary’s. Because the Greeks had no word for “son in law”, Joseph is listed instead as Heli’s son.

 

“And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,” (Luke 3:23 KJV)

 

One last thing. Remember that Luke’s account shows the bloodline of Jesus through Mary? It is absolutely necessary that His bloodline from David be established through His mother. Consider the following:

 

“Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh;” (Romans 1:3 KJV)

So, in summary, both Joseph and Mary were descended from David. Joseph’s record in Matthew satisfies the legal requirement of inheritance rights. Luke’s account of Mary’s bloodline establishes that was Jesus made from the seed of King David.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mood:
- 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add comment 

  Comments
 
|
|
|
|
|
 
Copyright © 2009 - 2012 True2ourselves. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.