banner
 
  Home >> Blogs >> Happy WHAT? (or, The Attack of the Angry Mommies)

this user is offline now  chessed777
Send message

Subscribe
Gender: Male
Status: Single
Age: 47 Years

City:Monroe
State: NC
Country: United States


Signup Date: 08/29/2010

Categories:
  Religion & Philosophy
  Goals, Plans, Hopes

Archive:
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010

Who Gives Kudos:





 

12:34 PM   [09 Oct 2010 | Saturday]

Happy WHAT? (or, The Attack of the Angry Mommies)

It looks like that time of year has come upon us again.

"What time?" you say? "Autumn? Halloween? Leaf color season?" No - none of that is that of which I speak. I am talking about Christmas season.

For the four years in four different stores that I worked through Christmas season - one of those years in management - It was always known that Christmas season started October 15. Regardless of the fact that some stores had their displays out before they even had Halloween candy sales, the start of the Christmas season in retail is October 15. (Leases on seasonal stores usually run from October 1.) It looks like it got started just a little early this year.

One thing that was never a problem when I worked in retail - and it wasn't that long ago, we are talking the 1990's - was the name of the season. It was always Christmas season, because that is the accepted and historical name of the holiday under consideration. I never knew anyone to have a problem with that.

The "war against Christmas" is a more recent occurrence. To the best of my memory, it's not even really been ten years since the name came under attack. Of course, attacks on having nativity scenes on public property have been around a bit longer. Now some would like to ban those even if they are on private property if they can be seen from a public road. How ridiculous!

This year, the war against the name has started in Richmond, Virginia. The annual parade there was renamed this year in an effort, they said, to be more inclusive. A power company named Dominion sponsored it this year, and the board voted to change the name to the "Dominion Holiday Parade". Here's where the story takes two turns I would like to discuss more in depth.

1. The American Family Association, with whom I often find myself at odds, immediately jumped on this story. They were quick to accuse Dominion Power of changing the name, and called for action of letter writing and possible boycott of the company in all states Dominion operates.

Quote from the original AFA Alert: This year, a company which took over sponsorship of the annual Richmond, Virginia, Christmas parade has ordered the city's organizers to change it to a "holiday" parade.

Dominion, an energy company operating in 12 states, has told the city it no longer wants to use "Christmas" as part of the parade name. Instead, Dominion said it will be known as the "Dominion Holiday Parade."


Note especially what they said at the bottom of the email: "Should Dominion become the title sponsor of your city's parade in the future, you can expect that they would not hesitate to censor "Christmas" in your town, too!"

All good and well ... if it were true! It appears once again, AFA jumped the gun and went off without having all the facts. The city of Richmond issued a statement that they were changing the name to, "Dominion Christmas Parade" because of the outpouring of support for "Christmas" being in the title. More importantly (for the discussion at hand), they said this: "This decision [to change the name to Holiday Parade] was made prior to approaching Dominion about becoming the main sponsor of the event. It was not done at the insistence of Dominion, as has been misreported in some instances."

AFA celebrated the change back to Christmas and told their members they had made all the difference and it was a victory all around.

Except that they were deceptive in getting there! Is AFA taking a "the ends justify the means" approach? Nowhere have I seen them issue an apology to Dominion for stirring up their hornet's nest of Angry Mommies (that is what 99% of their members are) to make calls and write letters and basically attack a company that had nothing to do with the change. Have you ever dealt with an Angry Mommy? They can be most unreasonable - especially when they are misinformed.

2. What if Dominion HAD made the change? They are the main sponsor, they are paying for most (if not all) of it so why should they be denied the right to name it? Without even devolving into the argument as to whether Jesus the Christ was really born in December or not (he wasn't - try April or September), or how Christmas actually came about (the Catholic Church began it as an alternative to the Pagan Winter Festival, because if the newly "converted" Pagans were required to be at a Mass, praying, they couldn't take part in the Pagan activities), this is still a free country and as such, someone can celebrate any Holiday they want and call it anything they want.

That said, actually banning displays, banning employees from saying "Merry Christmas" (as Walmart did in 2005: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15639425/), or insisting that a religious display is okay as long as it has a secular display as part of it (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynch_v._Donnelly) is going too far in the opposite direction. The last is particularly of interest ... while a portrayal of a historic birth is wrong (because, as they see it, it may not be true), it is okay as long as it is teamed up with a fat man who rides in a sleigh pulled by flying reindeer! Using the establishment clause to defend this does not work - the clause prohibits the endorsement of atheism over religion as much as it prohibits the endorsement of one religion over another.

The first settlers who came to this country celebrated Christmas. I don't know of any Christian who has ever been offended by someone wishing them a Happy Chanukkah - so if you want to celebrate that, DO. I personally celebrate both - just not as part of my Faith. As for the non-holiday, Kwanzaa, I will discuss that in a post sometime in December. Before you call me a racist, read that log when it is posted. (Here's a bit of a teaser though - the actual origin of Kwanzaa was distinctively antichristian.)

Mood: working
- 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add comment 

  Comments
 
|
|
|
|
|
 
Copyright © 2009 - 2012 True2ourselves. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.