If it’s true, would it be interesting or eerie? It’s called T2O’s, is it not? The exalted bible-fact that is not! Not that it’s not possible, but for the time, it’s possible marauding of progress. Who will attempt to apply His liberty to it? Behold the Killjoy? Spoiler of fellowship? If so, then this is just as bad as mine. Therefore, I fellowship in the truth with all and of all said facts. Trouble is, which will sustain the refining rigors of Christ Himself? Therein, I’ll stick with my unsettling rudeness with quite a bit more confidence than you will no matter how low of threat.
Now, was that all that hard? Or don’t you think I see myself caving in on a good representation of the scriptures interlaced oft with wit? Who am I anyways, just another who receives no comments on my post to blog, so remarks from the lesser shouldn’t matter to him.
So, let me ask that sensitive guard of fellowship in you, what are the ends of such liberty? Where should we be setting the watchmen’s post?
Therefore, I’ll go with the one ref. already revealed above that remarks on all banishments of Christ and “God”; (2 Corinthians). But I must disqualify myself for looking it up to convert Roberts “test” to the Apostle’s “knowing of whom”, which I didn’t.