Home >> Blogs >> Is That In The Bible? 2

this user is offline now  bloggerbob
Send message


  Religion & Philosophy
  Jobs, Work, Careers

August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011

Who Gives Kudos:
pryz (1)


   [20 Jun 2013 | Thursday]

Is That In The Bible? 2

~ “Cleanliness Is Next To Godliness” ~

This posting is a response to a blog entitled “7 Things You Won’t Find in the Bible… I Dare You to Look.” I am taking that challenge! The second listed phrase was “Cleanliness is next to Godliness.” I would agree that the phrase is not found in our English Bible—but what about the principle behind the phrase?
Words by themselves are meaningless—it is only when we attach meaning to the words that communication occurs. The principle behind this phrase can be found in the Bible, but the phrase can be heresy when different meanings are behind the words and the phrase. 
“Cleanliness is next to godliness” The author of that piece provides the following verses. His citations actually support the principle!

(1) “If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness” (1 John 1:9).
(2) “You are already clean because of the Word which I have spoken to you” (John 15:3).
(3) “Therefore, having these promises, beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all defilement of flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God” (2 Corinthians 7:1). 
(4) “Draw near to God and He will draw near to you. Cleanse your hands, you sinners; and purify your hearts, you double-minded” (James 4:8).
(5) “So that He might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the Word, that He might present to Himself the church in all her glory, having no spot or wrinkle or any such thing; but that she would be holy and blameless” (Ephesians 5:26-27).
Is “cleanliness next to Godliness”? Based upon the whole Scripture it is clear that God wants His children to be clean—particularly morally and spiritually.
~ Robert Lloyd Russell, ABUNDANT LIFE NOW
7:29 AM - 1 Comments - 1 Kudos - Add comment 

pryz | Fri Jun 21, 2013, 07:06

this user is offline now

“Words by themselves are meaningless—it is only when we attach meaning to the words that communication occurs.”


In an effort to answer your question with the above in mind, ““Cleanliness is next to Godliness.” I would agree that the phrase is not found in our English Bible—but what about the principle behind the phrase?”

They may support the principle, but it would be difficult to support the oft’ used citation as an isolated point of confidence.

The principle has been ransacked, a once wise quote turn into a relic left defenseless in the hands of the aimless.

It has an astounding base of recommendations through my years, I will grant the author that, but it is errant as being a quick-quip remedy for the soul. In my estimation, what we have here in its common use is a chief sampling of what man will do to stave off his response to God, his very own law of following God.

In effect, if we let our guard down on this sort, then two now are brought to bear this presence in our culture, the hearer and handler of the word. Because 4 out of the 5 are conditional, and that one is debatable. Without any knowledge of the condition is as good as a half-truth, and worthless interpretation unless it is to be used immediately preceding an explanation.

The skill involved with riding the crest of self-righteousness is nothing more than flinched havoc.

God bless you.


Copyright © 2009 - 2012 True2ourselves. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.