True2Ourselves
Already a member? login
Divider
Divider
Divider
Divider
Divider
Divider
Divider
Divider
Divider
Divider
Divider
Divider
  
+
Register FAQ A-Z directory Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

True2Ourselves Forums   > Community Topics > Sexual Morality  > SameSexMarriage/CaSupremeCt/Hearing3/5

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-02-2009, 01:39 AM
antonio
 
Posts: n/a
Default SameSexMarriage/CaSupremeCt/Hearing3/5

NEWS RELEASE
Release Number: 08 Release Date: February 3, 2009
Supreme Court to Hear Oral Arguments in
Prop. 8 Cases on March 5, 2009
San Francisco—The California Supreme Court today announced that it will hear oral arguments on Thursday, March 5, 2009, from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m., in three cases challenging the constitutionality of Proposition 8, a statewide ballot initiative that was passed by a majority of California voters in November 2008. (Strauss v. Horton, S168047; Tyler v. State of California, S168066; City and County of San Francisco v. Horton, S168078).
The oral argument session will be held in the Supreme Court’s Courtroom, Earl Warren Center, Fourth Floor, 350 McAllister Street, San Francisco, as part of the court’s regular monthly calendar session in March 2009. The complete March 2009 oral argument calendar is available at California Courts: Courts: Supreme Court .
In the cases before the court, the court has issued an order listing the following three issues to be briefed and argued:
(1) Is Proposition 8 invalid because it constitutes a revision of, rather than an amendment to, the California Constitution?
(2) Does Proposition 8 violate the separation of powers doctrine under the California Constitution?
(3) If Proposition 8 is not unconstitutional, what is its effect, if any, on the marriages of same-sex couples performed before the adoption of Proposition 8?
The three cases before the court were filed directly in the California Supreme Court on November 5, 2008, the day following the voters’ approval of Proposition 8 at the November 4, 2008 election.
On November 19, 2008, the court agreed to hear the cases, denied a request to stay the operation of Proposition 8 pending the court’s resolution of the cases, granted the motion of the official proponents of
2
Proposition 8 to intervene in the action, and established an expedited briefing schedule. Briefing in the Supreme Court was completed on January 21, 2009.
In an order issued today, the Supreme Court specified the amount of time each of the petitioners, the Attorney General, and the interveners will be allocated for oral argument (see below).
ACCESS TO ORAL ARGUMENTS
To increase public access to the court session, the Supreme Court has designated the California Channel, a public affairs cable network, to provide a live TV broadcast of the session and to serve as the “pool” channel. California Channel will provide a press pool outside the State Building to facilitate coverage of the oral argument by television and radio stations. For a list of cable companies that carry the network, see http://www.calchannel.com/carriage.htm .
Oral arguments also will be broadcast in an overflow viewing auditorium in the Milton Marks Conference Center, Hiram J. Smith State Office Building, Lower Level, 455 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco. In addition, the Supreme Court has announced that all briefs in the Proposition 8 cases are now posted to a special section of the California Courts Web site at California Courts: Courts: Supreme Court .
Under the applicable court rules, the Supreme Court generally issues a decision, through a written opinion, within 90 days of oral argument. For more information on the cases, including the attorneys of record, please see the Supreme Court’s online Case Information System at California Courts - Appellate Court Case Information.
Public and press seating in the courtroom will be extremely limited. Press seats will be available on a first-come, first-served basis, with one seat to be allocated per media organization. Requests for press seats should be sent to Lynn Holton, Public Information Officer, at lynn.holton@jud.ca.gov or 415-865-7726/7740.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Advertising
Google Adsense
 
This advertising will not be shown
in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today
and become a member on
True2Ourselves Forums
Standard Sponsored Links

  #2  
Old 03-02-2009, 01:53 AM
Daniel
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SameSexMarriage/CaSupremeCt/Hearing3/5

Im taking it you will want same sex marrage to pass and be allowed to happen in america. Or to stay passed (im not really up on this stuff).

How do you feel about poligamists having there way as well? nation wide multiple marrages. After all it seems fair that they should have their sexual preferances recognized as well doesnt it?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-02-2009, 08:00 AM
antonio
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SameSexMarriage/CaSupremeCt/Hearing3/5

Dear Dan--you wrote
Quote:
Im taking it you will want same sex marrage to pass and be allowed to happen in america. Or to stay passed (im not really up on this stuff).
Actually, I'm opposed to government being involved in marriage of any kind but if it's going to be involved then as in all things, government may not discriminate--it has to treat people equally.I support religions discriminating but not government.

Quote:
How do you feel about poligamists having there way as well? nation wide multiple marrages. After all it seems fair that they should have their sexual preferances recognized as well doesnt it?
I have no objection to it but polygamy isn't a sexual preference. No one is born a polygamist. It was a practice of Judaism and I'm not sure why it ended. It might be better than our current practice of millions of people living adulterous lives, having multiple wives/husbands one at a time--it might be better for the children.

By the way, in some countries, government discriminates against religions. I and my family are activists in one country, financially supporting freedom for Christians but also, Buddhists and Falun Gong practitioners.
blessings to you
antonio
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Advertising

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules Sponsored Links
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:11 PM.


true2ourselves
 
 
 

Flashcoms

You need to upgrade your Flash Player.

Version 8 or higher is required.

download from http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29