[kathaksung]

Al Qaida (or most other terrrorist group) exists where US intelligence dominates. Al Qaida in US when Bush needs excuse to activate Mid-east war. That was 911 attack. Al Qaida is everywhere in Iraq to bomb innocent civilians when US occupies Iraq. Strange to say, under the Saddam regime, there was no Al Qaida. Al Qaida seems only exist where the regime being controlled by US. So we see no Al qaida in Syria and Iran. But they appear to attack ordinary people when the government either is controlled by US intelligence or supported by US intelligence. That's why you see Al Qaida attacks in US, in Afghanistan, in Pakistan, in Iraq (after it is occupied by US). Because where they are protected by the intelligence, worked as a whip to beat people. When government want money and power, they beat the people with this whip (Al Qaida terror attack) People feel hurt then give up their civil rights and money to the government. DOJ got the Patriot Act. Pentagon got fat budget and Mid-east war.

[Brad]

Originally Posted by kathaksung

Al Qaida (or most other terrrorist group) exists where US intelligence dominates.

To me, that's like saying that the wind is caused by all the trees waving their branches around.

[khigg]

Did you think of this yourself? You really need to stop listening to the liberal media they are brainwashing you. If we would stop our intellegence then the terrorist would just go away. That is pretty nieve. Thank God George Bush went after them. We were not attacked under Bush's watch. That will not be said under B.H. Obama.

[Amadeus]

Originally Posted by khigg

Did you think of this yourself? You really need to stop listening to the liberal media they are brainwashing you. If we would stop our intellegence then the terrorist would just go away. That is pretty nieve. Thank God George Bush went after them. We were not attacked under Bush's watch. That will not be said under B.H. Obama.

Your bias is showing!

[Brad]

Originally Posted by khigg

We were not attacked under Bush's watch.

What the..?

[coachnathan]

Originally Posted by kathaksung

Al Qaida (or most other terrrorist group) exists where US intelligence dominates. Al Qaida in US when Bush needs excuse to activate Mid-east war. That was 911 attack. Al Qaida is everywhere in Iraq to bomb innocent civilians when US occupies Iraq. Strange to say, under the Saddam regime, there was no Al Qaida. Al Qaida seems only exist where the regime being controlled by US. So we see no Al qaida in Syria and Iran. But they appear to attack ordinary people when the government either is controlled by US intelligence or supported by US intelligence. That's why you see Al Qaida attacks in US, in Afghanistan, in Pakistan, in Iraq (after it is occupied by US). Because where they are protected by the intelligence, worked as a whip to beat people. When government want money and power, they beat the people with this whip (Al Qaida terror attack) People feel hurt then give up their civil rights and money to the government. DOJ got the Patriot Act. Pentagon got fat budget and Mid-east war.

I think you could be right.

[Soulheart3]

Originally Posted by kathaksung

Al Qaida (or most other terrrorist group) exists where US intelligence dominates. Al Qaida in US when Bush needs excuse to activate Mid-east war. That was 911 attack. Al Qaida is everywhere in Iraq to bomb innocent civilians when US occupies Iraq. Strange to say, under the Saddam regime, there was no Al Qaida. Al Qaida seems only exist where the regime being controlled by US. So we see no Al qaida in Syria and Iran. But they appear to attack ordinary people when the government either is controlled by US intelligence or supported by US intelligence. That's why you see Al Qaida attacks in US, in Afghanistan, in Pakistan, in Iraq (after it is occupied by US). Because where they are protected by the intelligence, worked as a whip to beat people. When government want money and power, they beat the people with this whip (Al Qaida terror attack) People feel hurt then give up their civil rights and money to the government. DOJ got the Patriot Act. Pentagon got fat budget and Mid-east war.

I think you are being a bit paranoid. It can happen to us all at times (being paranoid), but even those in power (political or journalist) with a left leaning (that hate Bush) have not brought this up and they would if there was even the slightest chance of it being true.

Originally Posted by kathaksung

Al Qaida (or most other terrrorist group) exists where US intelligence dominates. Al Qaida in US when Bush needs excuse to activate Mid-east war. That was 911 attack. Al Qaida is everywhere in Iraq to bomb innocent civilians when US occupies Iraq. Strange to say, under the Saddam regime, there was no Al Qaida. Al Qaida seems only exist where the regime being controlled by US. So we see no Al qaida in Syria and Iran. But they appear to attack ordinary people when the government either is controlled by US intelligence or supported by US intelligence. That's why you see Al Qaida attacks in US, in Afghanistan, in Pakistan, in Iraq (after it is occupied by US). Because where they are protected by the intelligence, worked as a whip to beat people. When government want money and power, they beat the people with this whip (Al Qaida terror attack) People feel hurt then give up their civil rights and money to the government. DOJ got the Patriot Act. Pentagon got fat budget and Mid-east war.

Terrorist organizations have had Terrorist Cells in the US since terrorism became widely used. There have been Red Army Faction cells, here, there has been IRA. The 911 attack was after Bush took office, but a Terrorist attack of that complexity was not planned between Jan and Sept of 2001. It was in planning for years, under Clinton’s administration.

Bin Laden was in the Sudan in the 90's, we knew exactly where he was, we were tracking him, literally foot step to foot step. Clinton did not commit to take advantage of that solid knowledge.

Terrorist organizations operate in friendly countries as well, there is AL Qaeda in Syria, and elsewhere in Northern Africa, Mid-East and in Southeast Asia. As an organization, they are fighting the US in a war. Since Bush, it's become harder for them to have cells here in US.

They operate in countries the U.S. are in because we are their prime enemy. We operate in places they are located. Your post is suggestive that the US Intel Community allows it, supports it, and is ultimately behind what they do. You're simply wrong. Al Qaeda conducts hostilities where they want Islamic control, your presentation is a convenient truth. Al Qaeda also Operates in Chechnya, in Georgia, and other former Soviet Bloc Countries. They also operate in Bosnia, and tried to intervene on the muslins behalf in the 3 way war in Bosnia, during the 90's. It was actually the Bosnian-Muslim President of Bosnia, located in Sarajevo that went through great pains to not accept their (Extremist) help during the war, he knew the consequences of allowing and accepting it. Until IFOR in ’95 then subsequently SFOR, we had no military presence in the Balkans. Terrorist cells were there before we ever got involved.

Again, you're presenting conspiracy theory. Simply put, if our enemy is in a location, we're going to fight at that location, it makes since if their enemy is in a location, they're going to be there. Al Qaeda was not in Iraq before the invasion, why? Because it was a Muslim Country, it was a country who behind the scenes provided funding of Terrorist organizations. Al Qaeda was in fact in Afghanistan, and Pakistan before 2001. Subsequently, we have no troops operating in Pakistan.

You must also understand the dynamic that is Al Qaeda, As an organization, they accomplished something no other terrorist organization had before, and that was to centralize command and control of the majority of terrorist cells already in operation.

Originally Posted by khigg

We were not attacked under Bush's watch. That will not be said under B.H. Obama.

Maybe it's just me... but 9/11 did happen on Bush's watch... ???

[Dewayne]

Originally Posted by LewisM3

Maybe it's just me... but 9/11 did happen on Bush's watch... ???

yes it was Bush's watch. he knows that! must have typed it wrong