banner
 
  Home >> Blogs

this user is offline now  pryz
Send message

Subscribe
Gender: Male
Status:
Age: 63 Years

City:
State:
Country: United States


Signup Date: 06/02/2012

Categories:
  Religion & Philosophy
  Life
  True2ourselves
  News & Politics
  Writing & Poetry

Archive:
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012

Who Gives Kudos:





 

8:48 AM   [25 Jan 2015 | Sunday]

Heads for Cover to Ultimate Subjection

 The spiritual discernment involved in interpreting I Corinthians’,11th chapter isn’t necessarily something you would think would fall into awkward use, but it surely does.

 

 

3But I want you to understand that Christ is the head of every man, and the man is the head of a woman, and God is the head of Christ.

4Every man who has something on his head while praying or prophesying disgraces his head.

5But every woman who has her head uncovered while praying or prophesying disgraces her head, for she is one and the same as the woman whose head is shaved.

6For if a woman does not cover her head, let her also have her hair cut off; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, let her cover her head.

7For a man ought not to have his head covered, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man.

8For man does not originate from woman, but woman from man;

9for indeed man was not created for the woman’s sake, but woman for the man’s sake.

10Therefore the woman ought to have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels. 11However, in the Lord, neither is woman independent of man, nor is man independent of woman. 12For as the woman originates from the man, so also the man has his birth through the woman; and all things originate from God.

13Judge for yourselves: is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered?

14Does not even nature itself teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him,

15but if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her? For her hair is given to her for a covering.

16But if one is inclined to be contentious, we have no other practice, nor have the churches of God.

 

It appears there is sometimes a temptation to overemphasize the headship seen in V3 that leads to being more at ease to separate the verse from the rest and not to accommodate the Apostle’s elaboration concerning that headship. I also see difficulties arise in inserting extra-biblical meanings which are neither disproved nor stated or implied at all.

There is only one reason:

V7”For a man ought not to have his head covered, since he is the image and glory of God”

Yes, the head of woman, of man, of Christ, God as stated, the order of subjection in the most fundamental of meanings.

Possibly, this is like the couple that went to the bank to withdraw a large stack of unbound singles from the teller. A large line of intensely curious onlookers behind sees the woman attempting to manhandle the many bills, but because she didn’t bring a purse, everyone becomes embarrassed with her. Of course, you-know-who was able to catch and carry every one of them with ease, recomposing all anxiety (shame).

The Bank (Head) wasn’t at fault for the missing purse, but it would have been handy advice to apply beforehand, or accommodate shall we say. Neither is the purse (covering) to be confused with the bank, but knows who may not be following instructions for the greater good.

My point is as with this passage, non-partitioned.

Mood:
- 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add comment 
 
|
|
|
|
|
 
Copyright © 2009 - 2012 True2ourselves. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.